Dr. Postert & Old Nick - O
-
There Is Justice
With this inspiration, we are given hope that the Universe may in fact be
Just. And by this sign we are given inspiration to stay the co...
Full Screem Key
-
Hip-Hop "September Clues" by Activist F11
*F11*
Hip-Hop "September Clues" by Activist F11
"*Land of the Living*" by CalculatedDyslexic
"*Land of the ...
F11 No Planes 9/11 Truth Rap
-
Activist - F11
Lyrics:
"Yeah So on 9/11...theres a whole bunch of different ideas on what
happened...
who was responsible...there's all this stuff that pe...
Meet Edna Cintron: She Was There.
-
Edna stood waving for rescue in the North Tower plane shape hole for at
least 20 minutes.
Her picture is in the NIST reports, waving to us that their tal...
This animation supplied by NTSB via a FOIA request, does not match the "official" flight path, according to johndoeX and others at Pilots for 9/11 Truth. According to this animation, apparently derived from Flight 77's FDR, Flight 77 did not hit the light poles.
New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
Thu Jun 21, 3:01 AM ET
Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77, which The 9/11 Report claims hit the Pentagon. Analysis of the data contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the buillding. ...
Calum Douglas presents his investigation into the flight data recorder from Flight 77, which was supplied to him under the US Freedom of Information Act, to an audience at the Indian YMCA in Fitzroy Square, London on 8th June 2007.
"I've read the research that says people don't recognize moving images as being propaganda, but you would think that people who are exposing 9/11 as an inside job would at least do a little bit of research into how these things work.
This is from 1994, and it talks about how the National Security Council can support an unpopular president. It says he needs an "unequivocal good-luck event" like a Pearl Harbor (or a 9/11) and it outlines the TV Fakery research at that time."
From the Thesis: "It is not yet common knowledge that some news is "doctored" or that what is happening before the camera may be only what is taking place in one small area. As stringers are employed more and more in the Third World, it is increasingly likely that activity may be staged or filmed selectively. When the biased nature of video coverage becomes common knowledge, televised dramatic events may well lose impact."
The article also offers an alternate conclusion that the "MTV Generation" may simply accept the images they see on TV as fact.
"Conversely, the MTV generation may come to believe the image anyway. It is easy to handle images whereas reading or thinking rationally takes work"
Audio of Dylan Avery arrogantly attacking "Killtown" for being "looney," when it is Avery who is wrong on the point of fact in question - i.e. the question of who allegedly filmed the CNN Exclusive Whitehall..as well as the issue of the likelihood that "amateur" videos were faked, available below in "BSregistration"'s Mash-up, "Loose Change Protects the Perps: 911 TV Fakery Censorship."
Impossible trumps Improbable, Dylan.
http://www.youtube.com/v/I4yEftBMbsw
When KT calmly asserts that "we don't know who took the video," Avery angrily shouts at him "Yes we do. Big Liar. Big Liar."
"Is he going to let me finish or just call me a liar?"
"No Killtown, because you are lying," says Dylan very convincingly.
Wow, you'd think, with that much conviction in his voice, Dylan himself would be more than certain? Of what kind of people does that level of disconnect remind you?
Avery, and his "Revolution Radio" host gang up on KT, speaking to him, patronizingly, as though he were a retarded child.
Dylan asserts he has watched CNN's, "America Remembers," DVD "a million times."
And Avery says, "Rose Arce is like: 'I was at Battery Park, I heard a plane coming over my head, I turned my camera up, and I saw the plane hit the building.' So that's just one of the problems..is that it wasn't shot by ....whoever."
Also unfortunate for the plausibility of his narrative, if you see the clip you will notice the camera was trained on the area of the impact well before the "plane" is near. It's not following the "plane." The "plane" is allegedly at a speed of over 500 miles-per-hour. The "plane" was supposedly one half mile away 3 seconds from "impact." When the clip starts, "it's" a mile away. That's how fast it is allegedly traveling. The shot is also, of necessity, a very highly zoomed and cropped shot - which will exaggerate any tiny movement of the cameraperson's hand. To keep the image steady, with that amount of zoom, is really difficult. The shot was set-up before the action - whatever that might have been. It's not an "amateur" as people have been misdirected to assume.
Highlights:
In a patronizing tone, with unintentional irony, Avery chides Killtown. He's exasperated as he impatiently intstructs him, shouting at him, "You've gotta get your facts right if you are going to make accusations like this."
But if you listen to the interview with Avery below, "Dylan Avery Spells it Out," you will see that Dylan was nowhere near New York City on that day. He thinks he saw it - because he saw it on T.V.!
Dylan Avery, Defender of the Status Quo, Cover-up Artist for the Mind-op Manipulators, and Televison Mind- Op Victim really believes, (listen to the tape). If he doesn't believe what he is saying, he is indeed a good scam artist and con man. The even scarier thought is that he does believe it, since he speaks it with so much conviction, yet is so thoroughly confused.
After watching the CNN special "millions" of times he is convinced that Rose Arce was interviewed on that show and that she there describes her work as the cameraperson.
Yet all the CNN Special depicts is an interview with Arce, interspersed with the blatantly fake but emotionally manipulative CNN Exclusive Whitehall footage. THAT IS ALL!
How come someone so out of touch with reality is one of the most high-profile proponants of "9/11 Truth" in the Mainstream Media?
Avery saw it on T.V. and thinks that's the same as, um, you know, seeing it "in real life."
"No Planes hitting the World Trade Towers defies logic, it not only defies logic, it defies everything we see with our own eyes," says Avery. "We," I guess refers to himself and his Television Friends?
Yet he did not see it with his own eyes. Avery says so himself in the interview shown in the vid above.
"Dylan is going-off based on what all of us are going with - we are going-off the video."
-Mike Swenson May 8, 2007 on the "Mike Swenson Show" interview with Dylan Avery and call-in guest, "Killtown".[hear it]
Photo From NIST. Copyright logo and attribution to "Michael Hezarkhani" is theirs.
Naturally, we'd all like to speak with Mr. "Hezarkhani" to find out from what location, exactly, he "took his vid," the "story" behind it. And what kind of camera "he is" going to claim he used, and how much money he was paid. So far, researchers have been unable to locate him.
An important point you can see illustrated in the above clip from the CNN "America Remembers" Special interview with Rose Arce is that the car Arce says she was traveling in, coming from the North, as it was, since she described leaving from her Apt. which is uptown from the Trade Towers, was not positioned in any possible location, whereby she could've seen the impact from any airplane hitting the South Side of the South Tower, should there have been one. As "Still Diggen'" pointed out, in the interview of Arce recorded below, she does not mention the appearance of an airplane. Instead, she specifically says “… and when they saw the second plane…” : The grid of New York streets, from her apt. to the Towers runs perpendicular to the South Side of the South Tower. If she were dropped off a few blocks from the Trade Tower complex, coming from the North, she'd be on the wrong side to see any aircraft impact. She also says she was inside of a car when the "plane" came over. How could she see a fourth of a mile into the sky, almost straight up, while sitting in a car?
For important background: From the MIT Technology Review: How "special effects" are now, not only de rigeur at the Cinema, they now can be applied in "real time":
